Chono7
Osim 390X ostalo rebandirano od rebandiranog?

Fury i Fury X novo , sve ostalo rebrandirano ( kolko sam ja skonto ).

Fury i Fury nano su isto Fiji, a ostatak 300 ekipe nebi baš nazvao rebrandirano jer dolaze sa HBMom

Ja sam sad nekih mj dana imao 290 tri x oc vaporicu i bila mi je odlicna, ali sad dok sam ju prodal i kupil si gtx 970 g1 gaming stvarno vidim kolko je nvidia bolja, u witcheru npr mi ide 15-20 fps vise na istim postavkama(sve osim visibility range i hairworks 70-80), zmaksano s hairworksom 50-60 fps, isto tak i u gta v i ostalim igrama, a graficka je puno tisa, dok vente stavim na 100% se cuje ko vaporica na 30% s tim da se jako jako manje grije gtx970, sve u svemu odusevljen sam.

Samo Fury X, Fury i Nano su zapravo potpuno nove kartice, dok ostala nova 300 serija ipak se pokazuje kao rebrand stare.

There's not one, not two, but three brand new high-end graphics cards on the way from AMD. As rumoured, AMD is dropping the numerical branding and is instead grouping its top cards under the "Fury" banner. All are based on its new Fiji chip, which is a tweaked version of the company's long-standing GCN architecture, and—as expected—all will come equipped with 4GB of stacked, on-package high bandwidth memory (HBM).

The flagship is the $649 R9 Fury X, which launches on June 24. At that price, it is pitched directly against Nvidia's GTX 980 Ti. It features 4096 stream processors—a huge jump over the 2816 stream processors found in the R9 290X—"up to" 1050MHz core clock, 256 texture units, 64 ROPs, HBM memory with 512 GB/s of bandwidth, a 67.2 GP/s pixel fill rate, and a six-phase VRM (voltage regulator module), which AMD claims is ideal for overclocking the card. We don't yet have UK pricing, but it'll probably be around £550.

Despite using two 8-pin power connectors, the Fury X's power consumption isn't as high as some feared: the TDP is 275W, just a tad higher than the R9 290X's, although it's worth bearing in mind that in real-world usage, the R9 290X was much closer to 300W. The Fury X supports up to 375W of power for overclocking.

AMD's reference cooler has gotten a makeover, with the company finally ditching the less-than-ideal plastic blower design of older cards. The Fury X's cooler is made of die cast aluminium and finished in a black nickel gloss and a soft touch black. It's quite a handsome thing, and thanks to the use of HBM memory AMD has been able to shrink the size of the card down to just a hair over 19cm (7.5in), which is all the more impressive given the huge die made up of 8.9 billion transistors. However, that doesn't take into account the watercooling tubes, which poke out of the rear of the card. Speaking of watercooling, the Fury X is cooled via an extremely thick 120mm radiator, rated for up to 500W of cooling.

Bling comes in the form of a light-up Radeon logo on the top of the card, as well an LED light strip that indicates the current level of GPU operation. Users can choose between either red or blue, while a separate green LED lights up when the card is idling and not making use of any GPU cores. For hooking up monitors, there are three full-size DisplayPort outputs, along with a single HDMI 1.4 port.

Updated: Other sites are reporting that it's HDMI 2.0. We're trying to confirm one way or the other with AMD.

Next up is the $549 R9 Fury, an air-cooled version of the Fury X. Specs are thin on the ground for regular Fury, but it appears to feature the same aluminium construction as the Fury X along with a blower-style fan for venting hot air directly out of the case. It's likely that the Fury will drop some stream processors and ROPs compared to the Fury X, but we'll have to wait until we hear something official from AMD to get confirmation.

The third card is an odd one. Called the R9 Nano, it too is based on the Fiji chip with HBM, but comes in at just 15cm/6in, a size usually reserved for low-end cards. There's a large fan on the side for venting air inside a PC case, and AMD claims the R9 Nano offer ups to two times the performance-per-watt over the R9 290X; higher than the improvement offered by the Fury and Fury X. No pricing was given for the R9 Nano, but it is supposed to launch "this summer."

There's also supposed to be a dual-GPU configuration of the Fury X on the way, AMD gave no additional details.

AMD did, however, unveil a rather mad-looking PC equipped with dual Fury X graphics cards. Called Project Quantum, it's a unique small form factor PC split into two sections, with the middle lit up by a set of glowing red LEDs. Other than the dual Fury X GPUs, AMD isn't talking about what else lies inside the PC, but we did spot a rather huge external PSU being used to power it. Sadly, you won't actually be able to go and buy the PC, at least for now: AMD is currently pitching the design to partners in order to bring it to market, but has no time frame for release.

For those who don't need quite so much graphics horsepower, AMD also revealed some updates to the R9 and R7 graphics card ranges. Sadly, the new 300-series is a rebrand of the older 200-series cards, and sport almost identical specs, bar an increased amount of memory. At the bottom is the R7 360, which comes equipped with 2GB of GDDR5 memory for $109; the R9 370 with up to 4GB of GDDR5 memory for $149; and the R9 380, also with up to 4GB of GDDR5 memory for $199. At the top end is R9 390 for $329 and the R9 390X for $429, both of which come with 8GB of GDDR5 memory. We're trying to hunt down some UK prices and will update the post when we have them.

http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/digitalfoundry-2015-amd-fury-x-the-new-leader-in-graphics-tech?utm_source=eurogamer&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=net-daily

Sviđa mi se nova arhitektura od AMD-a grafičke su manje, brže i ekonomičnije. Volio bi da je Sony/Microsoft sačekao malo pa ubacio jedan ovakav čip u nove konzole.

Onda bi imao bottleneck na cpu.. Morali bi stavljat modificirani intel, pa bi konzola kostala preko 5 soma kuna, a izasle bi 2016. godine. Predugo bi to bilo.

Onda bi imao bottleneck na cpu.. Morali bi stavljat modificirani intel, pa bi konzola kostala preko 5 soma kuna, a izasle bi 2016. godine. Predugo bi to bilo.
Upravo ovo.
A stalno se pricalo koliko su vec 360 i PS3 stari na launchu current gena. Sad da su izasle jos 3 g kasnije bio bi overkill. Sam gaming trazi nove konzole. Mislim da su dosta dobro ipak odabrali s obzirom na dostupan hardware i naravno treba odrzati  "pristupacnu konzolasku" cijenu.

To je uvijek tako, dok cekas jedno izade drugo i stalno u krug. Ja sam mogao isto pricekati 970 umjesto 770 ali nemozes to znati.

Razumijem ja to sve što vi pričate. Ja bi volio da su malo jače konzole ali šta je tu je :)

Benčmark Fjurija, samo ova GTX 980 Ti je monstrum 

http://videocardz.com/56728/amd-radeon-r9-fury-x-reviewers-guide



Necu ni pomisljat sta ce nvidia napravit sa novom serijom na 16nm

Kada će 390X , 980Ti i sve ostale napokon doći u Hrvatsku? Nadam se da se malo spusti cijena 970/980 i da vidim cijene AMD-ovih kartica.

Malo stariji podaci, ali služe svrsi, 2. mjesec 2015:

Nvidia may be betting its future on its embedded Tegra processor for cars, but PC gaming is the stake that’s keeping the company at the table.

On Wednesday, Nvidia reported record fourth quarter revenues of $1.25 billion, up 9 percent. Profits, meanwhile, rose by a healthy 31 percent to $193 million.

But two numbers continue to put the company’s achievements in perspective. While Nvidia’s GPU business racked up $1.07 billion in revenue, its Tegra processor business—currently deployed primarily in mobile products—accounted for only $112 million. In fact, Tegra revenue fell 33 percent sequentially and 15 percent from a year ago as several smartphones and tablet designs reached the end of their life.

Nvidia chief executive Jen-Hsun Huang may have spent hours at CES describing how his company plans to enter the automotive business with new chips based upon its Tegra platform, but the numbers don’t lie: Nvidia is a GPU company that’s heavily reliant on desktops and notebook PCs. Nvidia can’t even count on the console market for revenue, as rival AMD made a clean sweep of the Microsoft, Nintendo, and Sony.

Still, who cares? Revenue from the company’s GeForce business jumped 38 percent as the company’s “Maxwell” based products were snapped up by gamers: the GeForce GTX 980 and 970 on the high end, and the new 960 addressing the 1080p “sweet spot” of mainstream gaming.

Still, Huang is obsessed with growing businesses beyond the PC. “GeForce and SHIELD are extending our reach in the rapidly growing global gaming market,” Huang said in a statement Wednesday. “Our Drive auto-computing platform is at the center of the advance toward self-driving cars. Grid is enabling enterprises to finally virtualize graphics-intensive applications. And our Tesla accelerated computing platform is helping to ignite the deep learning revolution.”

Even sales within the company’s Tegra business, which includes smartphones, tablets, gaming devices, and automotive systems, was primarily driven by two products: Nvidia’s Shield tablet—which has some of the cachet but none of the sales of either the Apple iPad, Microsoft Surface, or Google Nexus devices—and automotive infotainment systems.

The latter won’t be playing Crysis anytime soon, so Nvidia can’t wait for autonomous cars to arrive and harness the visual computing power of its embedded chips—especially the new Tegra X1, which harnesses its PC graphics architecture.

Pat Moorhead, principal analyst at Moor Insights and Strategy, tweeted that “‘Tegra is for automotive and gaming.’ Note no phones.” That may be because Nvidia’s latest Tegra chips are too powerful (and power-hungry) for products without their own robust power supply, like a car or PC.

Nvidia’s numbers should remind you of one of its chief competitors, Intel, which is running down the Internet of Things while raking in gobs of money from its server business. Both Intel and Nvidia can afford to tilt at windmills while their other businesses keep them afloat—and eventually, they may hit what they’re aiming for.

Novi driveri Nvidie su vani. Za Batmana

umro na taj bench sliku
unity mid postavke hahaaha epic

ali to je sve na 4k
takve kartice nisu fakat potrebne ako nemislite igrat na preko 1080p ali ako se moze uzet garant se nece godinama morat ni pomislit o mjenjanju

Ja sam se prebacio na stare 344.75, sad ne znam kakvi su ovi zadnji nemisilm na batman drivere nego prije sto su dosli?

Oni prije Batmana su odlični moram priznati. Ja ih ne mijenjam zbog Batsa jer ga neću igrati, a u W3 imam enormne boostove sa postojećim!

Tnx i ja igram witchera na ovim starim driverima imam padova na 25fps nista strasno