Lik Tu su negdje i losiji je razlika. Intel 6900k je govno i jedna od vecih pizdarija Intela. Totalno neisplativ CPU u bilo kojem smislu kupnje. Ne mozes Ryzen 1700 OCom pretvorit u 1800X, jer ti treba 1700X koji ne kosta 330, vec 400$..
Ne trebas mijenjat maticnu ako prelazis na Kaby Lake, jer je isti socket kao i Skylake, dakle 1151, treba ti samo novi BIOS za nesto starije maticne. Za kupnju Ryzena, treba ti nova maticna, novi socket AM4 koji ce se valjda zadrzati dovoljno dugo.
Ako se vodimo prema Steamu kao najvecoj gaming platformi, gdje govorimo o uzorku od 220 milijuna AKTIVNIH korisnika, onda ispada da 32% korisnika koristi mulitmonitor setup, dakle 3840 x 1080 rezoluciju, a njih 43% i dalje koristi 1080p rezoluciju.
Sto se tice ostalog slazem se, Ryzen je bolja investicija ako se gleda sira slika, a ne samo gaming.
Evo u cemu je Ryzen jebeno dobar i zasto je cijena toliko bitna da Intel malo razmisli prije pumpanja astronomskih vrijednosti pored svojih proizvoda:
AMD’s new high-end Ryzen 7 processors kick ass, going toe-to-toe with Intel’s cheapest 8-core chips in productivity tasks at a whopping 50 percent cost savings—or more if you opt anything but the flagship $500 Ryzen 7 1800X.
No, Ryzen chips don’t offer the same raw gaming performance as Intel’s quad-core chips. That’s indisputable. But neither do the high-end Intel Extreme Edition processors that are Ryzen’s true peers. While comparing Ryzen against Intel quad-cores is illuminating for potential upgraders focused solely on gaming, it’s not quite apples-to-apples. A more realistic way to look at it: Intel’s quad-core Core i5 and Core i7 chips are excellent gaming chips with decent productivity chops, while Ryzen and Intel’s Extreme Edition CPUs are killer productivity and content-creation processors that are decent in gaming.
Ryzen’s damned affordable pricing, however, goes a long way toward bridging the gap.
The mammoth price difference between the $1,050 Core i7-6900K and AMD’s processors leave you a lot of budgetary wiggle room to splurge on a GPU. In fact, for the same price as the Core i7-6900K, you could pick up a $330 Ryzen 7 1700 CPU and Nvidia’s beastly new $700 GeForce GTX 1080 Ti and still have $20 left over for a large pizza.
Yes, you read that right. For the same price as Intel’s cheapest 8-core processor, you can pick up a competitive 8-core AMD chip and the most powerful graphics card ever released. That’s an eye-opener.
In response to criticism over Ryzen’s gaming performance, AMD noted that the performance gap shrinks when your pair the processor with a potent graphics card and game at 4K resolution. That’s true! While doing so doesn’t reflect the pure gaming potential of a CPU (which is why in our Ryzen review we tested at 1080p), strenuous 4K gaming shifts the system bottleneck from the processor to the graphics card instead, which can even out the real-world playing field between CPUs of varying gaming-performance chops.
With a Ryzen chip and Nvidia’s monster graphics card in hand, it’s time to put that theory to the test. Here are some brief benchmarks showing how the dynamic duo fares in a handful of games at 4K and 1440p resolutions—for less than the cost of Intel’s cheapest 8-core chip alone.
Cijeli clanak mozete procitati ovdje:
http://www.pcworld.com/article/3179208/gaming/4k-gaming-tested-amd-ryzen-and-geforce-gtx-1080-ti-for-less-than-intels-cheapest-8-core-chip.html
